|
October 13, 2023 CERTIFIED MAIL Sue Walker, Authorized Agent Hammer Residence Inc. 1909 Wayzata Blvd Wayzata, MN 55391-2047 License Number 1071279-HCBS (Home and Community-Based Services) License Number 1116914-H_CRS (Home and Community-Based Services-Community Residential Setting) Report Number 202301962 DETERMINATION OF MALTREATMENT AND ORDER TO PAY A FINE Dear Sue Walker: The Department of Human Services (DHS) determined that Hammer Residence, Inc. located at 3066 Duluth Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota, is responsible for maltreatment including serious maltreatment by neglect. Based on this determination, DHS is ordering you to pay a fine of $8000. Details of our findings are provided below and in the enclosed Investigation Memorandum for report 202301962. Our next steps and your options are also detailed. I. Determination of Maltreatment It was reported that a vulnerable adult’s (VA1’s) teeth were “black from the gums up” and VA1 had not seen a dentist in a year and a half. During the course of the investigation, there were concerns of a lapse of dental cares for three other vulnerable adults (VA2, VA3, and VA4). Based on the maltreatment investigation, DHS determined that Hammer Residence Inc was responsible for neglect of VA1 ($5000), VA2, VA3, and VA4 ($1000 each). See the enclosed Investigation Memorandum for more information. Legal Authority: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.557, subdivision 9c. Fine: $8000 Citations 1. Citation: Minnesota Statutes, section245D.05, subdivision 1. Violation: For four persons (C1-C4) whose record was reviewed, the license holder did not meet health service needs assigned in the support plan or support plan addendum as required. The license holder was assigned responsibility for assisting C1 with dental appointments. In 2019, C1 saw the dentist on two occasions. On December 5, 2019, the facility cancelled the appointment for an unknown reason, and two appointments (March 24 and April 21, 2020) were cancelled due to COVID. C1 was next seen May 23, 2022 (two years-one month since the last COVID cancelled appointment) and a six-month follow-up appointment was recommended. C1 was not seen again until June 2, 2023 (one-year later). The license holder was assigned responsibility for assisting C2 with dental appointments. After a dental appointment on August 14, 2019, a three-month follow-up appointment was recommended but C2 did not see a dentist until March 16, 2023 (three years-seven months later); and did not received diental care until July 23, 2023 (three years-nine months later). The license holder was assigned responsibility for assisting C3 with dental appointments. At a dental appointment on January 11, 2019, the dentist ordered C3 to be seen in three months, but C3 was not seen by a dentist until December 9, 2019 (eleven months later). From that point, C3 did not see a dentist until April 8, 2021 (one year-four months later); had work completed on May 5, 2021 (one year-five months later); and as of the date of this investigation had not yet seen a dentist again (two years-three months later). The license holder was assigned resonsbility for assisting C4 with dental appointments. After a dental appointment on August 14, 2019, C4 did not see a dentist until March 16, 2023 (three years-seven months later); and did not receive dental care until July 23, 2023 (three years-nine months later). Corrective Action Required: On an ongoing basis, you must maintain compliance as required in this subdivision. 2. Citation: Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.64, subdivision 3. Violation: For two staff persons whose record was reviewed (P1-P2), the license holder did not ensure each new mandated reporter received orientation and/or annual training on the Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act as required. Corrective Action Required: On an ongoing basis, you must maintain compliance as required in this subdivision. 3. Citation: Minnesota Statutes, section 245D.09, subdivision 4a. Violation: For five staff persons whose record was reviewed (P1-P5), the license holder did not provide training to staff regarding the individual service receipient (C1-C4) needs as required. A DHS investigator requested copies of P1s’-P5’s training record that showed when each was provided orientation and training on C1’s-C4’s individual service needs, including their support plan or support plan addendum as it related to the responsibilities assigned to the license holder and their individual abuse prevention plan, to achieve and demonstrate an understanding of each as a unique individual, and how to implement those plans. P2 and P3 were not trained on C4’s program plans. P4 was not trained on C1’s and C3’s program plans. P1 and P5 were not trained on C1’s-C4’s program plans. Corrective Action Required: On an ongoing basis, you must maintain compliance as required in this subdivision. II. Order to Pay a Fine Because DHS determined that Hammer Residence inc. is responsible for maltreatment including serious maltreatment, you must pay a $8000 fine. The act of maltreatment was determined to be serious because the VA was not seen by a dentist for three years and then required all his/her teeth to be pulled. Legal Authority: Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.07, subdivision 3, paragraph (c), subparagraph (4). Billing and Payment of the Fine DHS will send you an invoice for the $8000 fine. Payment must be made as directed on the invoice. If you request a contested case hearing, as described below, do not pay the fine at this time. After the contested case hearing, the Commissioner of DHS will issue a final order. Please note, you may not avoid payment of this fine by closing, selling, or otherwise transferring the license to a third party. If this occurs, each controlling individual is personally and jointly responsible for payment. If you do not pay the fine on or before the date specified on the invoice and you did not request a contested case hearing, as described below, the Commissioner may issue a second fine, may not issue or reissue a license, or may suspend the license until the license holder pays the fine. III. YOUR RIGHT TO APPEAL You have right to appeal the maltreatment determination and/or fine. Please see options below. Should you exercise your rights to appeal send: 1.
Right to appeal the fine and maltreatment determination You have the right to appeal the fine and maltreatment determination. Your request must be in writing and clearly state that you are requesting a contested case hearing for this matter. Your request must be made before the deadlines provided below. If you do not meet this deadline, you lose your right to an administrative appeal. The timeline to appeal began when you received this order. If you are mailing your request, it must be sent by certified mail and postmarked within 15 calendar days from when you received this order. See address Section III. If your request is being personally delivered, it must be received by DHS within 15 calendar days from when you received this order. See address Section III. Upon DHS’ receipt of your timely appeal, your case would be scheduled for a contested case hearing in front of an Administrative Law Judge. After this hearing, the Commissioner of DHS will issue a final order. 2. Request for reconsideration of the maltreatment determination only If you do not appeal the fine, you may still request reconsideration of the maltreatment determination. Your request must be made before the deadlines provided below. If you do not meet this deadline, you lose your right to request reconsideration. The timeline to request reconsideration began when you received this order. Your request must: · Be in writing · Clearly state that you are requesting reconsideration of the maltreatment determination · Identify what is inaccurate or incomplete about the information in the Investigation Memorandum · Supply information that is accurate or more complete · State why you believe the finding of maltreatment should be changed · Be made before the deadlines provided below. Your request must be postmarked within 15 calendar days from when you received this order. See address Section III. A response to your reconsideration request will be mailed within 15 working days after DHS receives your request. You have the right to request a fair hearing if a response is not mailed within 15 working days. 3. Right to appeal the order to pay a fine only You have the right to only appeal the fine. Your request must be in writing and clearly state that you are requesting a contested case hearing for this matter. Your request must be made before the deadlines provided below. If you do not meet this deadline, you lose your right to an administrative appeal. The timeline to appeal began when you received this order. If you are mailing your request, it must be sent by certified mail and postmarked within 10 calendar days from when you received this order. See address Section III. If your request is being personally delivered, it must be received by DHS within 10 calendar days from when you received this order. See address Section III. Upon DHS’ receipt of your timely appeal, your case would be scheduled for a contested case hearing in front of an Administrative Law Judge. After this hearing, the Commissioner of DHS will issue a final order. 4. Legal representation at the contested case hearing You do not need a lawyer to appeal. However, a lawyer can help you with your appeal. The state or county will not get you a lawyer and will not pay for a lawyer. If you cannot afford a lawyer, you may be able to get free legal advice or help with your appeal. To find out if free help is available, contact: Volunteer Lawyers Network at 612-752-6677; Central Minnesota Legal Services at 612-332-8151; Southern Minnesota Legal Services at 651-222-4731; or go to www.justice4mn.org to find a local legal services program that may be able to help you. You can also find information on contested cases from the Office of Administrative Hearings website at https://mn.gov/oah/self-help. Click on Administrative Law Overview, then click on Administrative Law Contested Case Hearing Guide for a list of frequently asked questions. Legal authority for this licensing action · This action is taken under Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.07, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), which describes under which conditions DHS may impose a fine against a license. · Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.07, subdivision 3, paragraph (c), clause (4), item (i) provides that DHS may impose a $1000 fine for each determination of maltreatment of a vulnerable adult under section 626.557 for which the license holder is determined responsible. · Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.07, subdivision 3, paragraph (c), clause (4), item (iI) provides that DHS may impose a $5000 fine for each determination of maltreatment of a vulnerable adult under section 626.557 which meets the definition of serious maltreatment for which the license holder is determined responsible. · In determining whether the facility, an individual, or both are responsible for substantiated maltreatment, DHS must consider the mitigating factors provided in Minnesota Statutes, section 626.557, subdivision 9c, paragraph (c). · Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.07, subdivision 3, paragraph (c), clause (5) states that license holders may not avoid payment of a fine by closing, selling, or transferring a license. · License holders have a right to appeal licensing actions and request a contested case hearing, under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 14 and Minnesota Rules, parts 1400.8505 to 1400.8612. · License holders have a right to request reconsideration of a maltreatment determination, under Minnesota Statutes, section 626.557, subdivision 9d. · Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.04, subdivision 7, paragraph (d), clause (4), states that DHS shall not issue or reissue a license if the applicant, license holder, or controlling individual has an outstanding debt related to a license fee, licensing fine, or settlement agreement for which payment is delinquent. · Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.07, subdivision 3, paragraph (c), clause (2), states that that the license holder shall pay the fine assessed on or before the payment date specified, and if the license holder does not do so the commissioner may issue a second fine or suspend the license until the license holder complies. Questions If you have any further questions regarding this matter, you may contact Melanie Daniel, Supervisor, at 651-431-6559. Sincerely,
Maggie Hanson, Intake & Investigations Unit Manager Licensing Division Office of Inspector General Enclosure
|
