|
August 17, 2026 CERTIFIED MAIL Jafar Wako Hussen, Authorized Agent Relief Health Services LLC 1935 County Road B2 West, Suite 45 Saint Paul, MN 55113-2780 License Number 1107690 (Home and Community-Based Services) Report Number 202509092 (Licensing Complaint Investigation) ORDER OF LICENSE REVOCATION Dear Jafar Wako Hussen: The Department of Human Services (DHS) is revoking your license to provide Home and Community-Based Services at 1935 County Road B2 West, Suite 45, Saint Paul, Minnesota. This revocation is based on providing false and misleading information, violations of applicable laws and rules, and the Commissioner’s evaluation of your program. Details of our findings are provided below. Our next steps and your options are also detailed. The revocation goes into effect on September 16, 2026, at 11:59 p.m. to allow time for delivery of this order and ten days for you to inform the Commissioner whether you intend to appeal the license revocation explained below. The effective date of the revocation also allows time to ensure continuity of care for persons served by the program. REASON FOR LICENSE REVOCATION 1. False or misleading information DHS determined that you knowingly withheld relevant information or provided false or misleading information regarding compliance with applicable laws and rules. At the November 2025, licensing review, you told DHS licensors that you had all required service recipient and program records, but when licensors requested some records, you stated you had the records, but they were not available for the licensors to review because you were transitioning to an electronic health records system. You also stated some service recipient records were signed by case managers, but they were not available for DHS review. However, your staff told DHS licensors that these records had not been signed, and most had not been completed at all. Legal Authority: Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.07, subdivision 3(a)(3). 2. Failure to comply with laws and rules LICENSING VIOLATIONS DETERMINED ON NOVEMBER 3-4, 2025 DHS determined that your program failed to follow licensing rules and statutes, as described below. Program Coordination, Evaluation, and Oversight Violation 1. Violation: The license holder did not meet the requirements for program coordination, evaluation, and oversight. a. The license holder identified SP4 as the designated coordinator. The license holder did not ensure that SP4 provided coordination of service delivery and evaluation for each person served by the program. See citations 2 through 17 for the designated coordinator’s inability to provide supervision, support and evaluation of the activities including: · oversight of the license holder’s responsibilities assigned in the person’s coordinated service and support plan and the coordinated service and support plan addendum; · taking the action necessary to facilitate the accomplishment of the outcomes according to the requirements in 245D.07; · instruction and assistance to direct support staff implementing the coordinated service and support plan and the service outcomes, including direct observation of service delivery sufficient to assess staff competency; and · evaluation of the effectiveness of service delivery, methodologies, and progress on the person's outcomes based on the measurable and observable criteria for identifying when the desired outcome has been achieved according to the requirements in section 245D.07. a. The license holder identified SP5 as the designated manager. The license holder did not ensure that SP5 provided program management and oversight of the services provided by the license holder. See citations 2 through 17 for the designated manager’s inability to demonstrate: · maintaining a current understanding of the licensing requirements sufficient to ensure compliance throughout the program is identified in section 245A.04, subdivision 1, paragraph (e), and when applicable, as identified in 256B.04, subdivision 21, paragraph (g); · ensuring the duties of the designated coordinator are fulfilled according to the requirements in subdivision (2); · ensuring the program implements corrective action identified as necessary by the program following review of incident and emergency reports according to the requirements in section 245D.11, subdivision 2, clause (7). An internal review of incident reports of alleged or suspected maltreatment must be conducted according to the requirements in section 245A.65, subdivision 1, paragraph (b); · evaluation of satisfaction of persons served by the program, the person's legal representative, if any, and the case manager, with the service delivery and progress toward accomplishing outcomes identified in sections 245D.07 and 245D.071, and ensuring and protecting each person's rights as identified in section 245D.04; · ensuring staff competency requirements are met according to the requirements in section 245D.09, subdivision 3, and ensuring staff orientation and training is provided according to the requirements in section 245D.09, subdivisions 4, 4a, and 5; · ensuring corrective action is taken when ordered by the commissioner and that the terms and conditions of the license and any variances are met; and · evaluating the information identified in clauses (1) to (6) to develop, document, and implement ongoing program improvements. Statute Violated: Minnesota Statutes, section 245D.081. Service Recipient Violations 2. Violation: For three of five persons whose records were reviewed (P1-P3), the license holder did not develop and review individual abuse prevention plans (IAPPs) as required. Minnesota Statutes, 245A.02, subdivision 2b defines “annual” or “annually” to mean prior to or within the same month of the subsequent year. a. The license holder did not develop an IAPP for P1 as part of the initial individual program plan or service plan. The license holder initiated P1’s services on January 23, 2023. The license holder developed P1’s IAPP on May 13, 2025. b. The license holder did not develop an IAPP for P2 that included an accurate individualized assessment of P2’s susceptibility to physical abuse, self-abuse, and financial abuse. The license holder completed an assessment that was inconsistent with information maintained in P2’s record. Additionally, the license holder did not document the review of P2’s IAPP annually with their interdisciplinary team. c. The license holder did not develop an IAPP for P3 as part of the initial individual program plan or service plan. The license holder initiated P3’s services on November 6, 2023. The license holder developed P3’s IAPP on November 1, 2024. Additionally, the license holder did not develop an IAPP that contained an individualized assessment of P3’s susceptibility to abuse. The license holder assessed that P3 was not susceptible to self-abuse. This was not consistent with information elsewhere in P3’s support plan addendum that documented P3 would neglect to take their prescribed medication. Statute Violated: Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.65, subdivision 2, paragraph (b). 3. Violation: For three persons whose records were reviewed (P1-P3), the license holder did not provide service recipient rights as required. The license holder did not provide P1-P3 with a written notice that identified the service recipient rights and an explanation of those rights as required. a. The license holder did not provide the service recipient rights for P1 annually in 2025. b. The license holder did not provide the service recipient rights for P2 in 2023 and 2025. c. The license holder did not provide the service recipient rights for P3 within five working days of service initiation. The license holder initiated P3’s services on November 6, 2023. The license holder provided these to P3 on November 5, 2024. Statute Violated: Minnesota Statutes, section 245D.04, subdivision 1. 4. Violation: For two persons whose records were reviewed (P1, P2), the license holder did not document health needs as required. The license holder did not maintain documentation of how P1’s and P2’s health needs would be met, including a description of the procedures the license holder would follow in order to provide medication assistance. Statute Violated: Minnesota Statutes, section 245D.05, subdivision 1. 5. Violation: For one person whose record was reviewed (P2), the license holder did not meet the protection standards regarding incident response and reporting as required. The license holder did not maintain information about or report an incident to P2’s case manager within 24 hours of an incident occurring while services were provided on August 13, 2025 that included: · the name of the person or persons involved in the incident; · the date, time, and location of the incident or emergency; · a description of the incident or emergency; · a description of the response to the incident or emergency and whether a person's support plan addendum or program policies and procedures were implemented as applicable; · the name of the staff person or persons who responded to the incident or emergency; and · the determination of whether corrective action is necessary based on the results of the review. Statute Violated: Minnesota Statutes, section 245D.06, subdivision 1. 6. Violation: For one person whose record was reviewed (P2), the license holder did not provide person-centered planning and service delivery as required. The license holder did not provide person-centered planning and service delivery when they did not provide services in response to P2’s preferences for their preferred name. The license holder informed licensors of P2’s preference to be referred by their preferred name, however; the license holder did not utilize or document this information in P2’s service recipient record. Statute Violated: Minnesota Statutes, section 245D.07, subdivision 1a. 7. Violation: For one person whose record was reviewed (P2), the license holder did not complete initial service planning for basic support services as required. The license holder did not review and revise P2’s support plan addendum within 60 calendar days of service initiation, to document the services that would be provided including how and when services would be provided. Additionally, the license holder documented P2’s support team would meet quarterly in P2’s support plan addendum. The license holder did not participate in service planning meetings according to these established timeframes for P2 in 2023, 2024 and 2025. Statute Violated: Minnesota Statutes, section 245D.07, subdivision 2. 8. Violation: For three persons whose records were reviewed (P1-P3), the license holder did not provide written reports as required. a. The license holder documented in P1’s support plan addendum that progress reports and recommendations were to be provided quarterly to P1’s support team. The license holder did not provide reports according to this established timeline. The license holder provided progress reviews for P1 on July 24, 2023, and July 23, 2024. b. The license holder documented in P2’s support plan addendum that progress reports and recommendations were to be provided quarterly to P2’s support team. The license holder did not provide reports according to this established timeline. c. The license holder documented in P3’s support plan addendum that progress reports and recommendations were to be provided quarterly to P3’s support team. The license holder did not provide reports according to this established timeline. The license holder provided one progress review on May 6, 2024. Statute Violated: Minnesota Statutes, section 245D.07, subdivision 3. 9. Violation: For two persons whose records were reviewed (P1, P3), the license holder did not complete initial service planning for intensive services as required. a. The license holder initiated P1’s services on January 23, 2023. The license holder did not complete assessments which produced information about P1 that described P1’s overall strengths, functional skills and abilities, and behaviors or symptoms before providing 45 days of service. This was completed on April 1, 2025. Additionally, the license holder did not hold an initial planning meeting with P1, P1’s case manager, or other members of P1’s support team before providing 45 days of service. The license holder did not maintain documentation which was sufficient for licensors to determine when or if this meeting occurred. b. The license holder initiated P3’s services on November 6, 2023. The license holder did not complete assessments in the following areas before providing 45 days of service to P3: · the person's ability to self-manage health and medical needs to maintain or improve physical, mental, and emotional well-being, including, when applicable, allergies, seizures, choking, special dietary needs, chronic medical conditions, self-administration of medication or treatment orders, preventative screening, and medical and dental appointments; · the person's ability to self-manage personal safety to avoid injury or accident in the service setting, including, when applicable, risk of falling, mobility, regulating water temperature, community survival skills, water safety skills, and sensory disabilities; and · the person's ability to self-manage symptoms or behavior that may otherwise result in an incident as defined in section 245D.02, subdivision 11, clauses (4) to (7), suspension or termination of services by the license holder, or other symptoms or behaviors that may jeopardize the health and welfare of the person or others. The license holder completed assessments on November 1, 2024. Additionally, the license holder held an initial planning meeting on December 21, 2023 for P3; however P3’s case manager was not present for the meeting. Statute Violated: Minnesota Statutes, section 245D.071, subdivision 3, paragraph (b), (c) and (d). 10. Violation: For two persons whose records were reviewed (P1, P3), the license holder did not complete service outcomes and supports as required. The license holder did not develop a service plan for P1 and P3 within 10 working days of the required timeline of the initial planning meeting that documented the following supports and methods to be implemented to support the person and accomplish outcomes related to acquiring, retaining, or improving skills and physical, mental, and emotional health and well-being: · the methods or actions that will be used to support the person and to accomplish the service outcomes, including information about: o any changes or modifications to the physical and social environments necessary when the service supports are provided; o any equipment and materials required; and o techniques that are consistent with the person's communication mode and learning style; · the measurable and observable criteria for identifying when the desired outcome has been achieved and how data will be collected; · the projected starting date for implementing the supports and methods and the date by which progress towards accomplishing the outcomes will be reviewed and evaluated; and · the names of the staff or position responsible for implementing the supports and methods. P1’s services were initiated by the license holder on January 23, 2023. This was completed for P1 on May 6, 2025. P3’s services were initiated by the license holder on November 6, 2023. This was completed for P3 on May 5, 2025. Statute Violated: Minnesota Statutes, section 245D.071, subdivision 4. 11. Violation: For two persons whose records were reviewed (P1, P3), the license holder did not complete service plan review and evaluation as required. The license holder documented in P1’s and P3’s support plan addendums that service plan review meetings would be held quarterly. The license holder did not meet with P1 and P1’s case manager or P3 and P3’s case manager according to the established timelines. Statute Violated: Minnesota Statutes, section 245D.071, subdivision 5, paragraph (a). 12. Violation: For two persons whose records were reviewed (P1, P3), the license holder did not provide policies and procedures as required. The license holder did not inform and provide copies of the following policies and procedures to P1 and P1’s case manager, and to P3’s case manager within five working days of service initiation: · grievance policy and procedure; · service suspension policy and procedure; and · service termination policy and procedure. Statute Violated: Minnesota Statutes, section 245D.10, subdivision 4. 13. Violation: For three persons whose records were reviewed (P1-P3), the license holder did not evaluate positive support strategies as required. The license holder did not evaluate the identified positive support strategies with P1-P3 at least every six months. Rule Violated: Minnesota Rules, 9544.0030 subpart 1. Staffing Standards Violations 14. Violation: For two of three staff persons whose records were reviewed (SP1, SP3), the license holder did not provide orientation as required. a. SP1 was hired on January 3, 2024. The license holder did not provide SP1 with orientation training within 60 calendar days of hire on the following topics: · the license holder’s current policies and procedures for: o emergency response, reporting and review. SP1 completed this training on March 16, 2024; o incident response and reporting. SP1 completed this training on March 14, 2024; · data privacy requirements according to sections 13.01 to 13.10 and 13.46, the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and staff responsibilities related to complying with data privacy practices. SP1 completed this training on March 16, 2024; · the service recipient rights and staff responsibilities related to ensuring the exercise and protection of those rights according to the requirements in section 245D.04. SP1 completed this training on March 16, 2024; · the principles of person-centered service planning and delivery as identified in section 245D.07, subdivision 1a, and how they apply to direct support service provided by the staff person. SP1 completed this training on March 17, 2024; · basic first aid. SP1 completed this training on March 14, 2024; and · strategies to minimize the risk of sexual violence, including concepts of health relationships, consent, and bodily autonomy of people with disabilities. SP1 completed this training on March 16, 2024. b. SP3 was hired on April 17, 2023. The license holder did not provide SP3 with orientation training on basic first aid within 60 calendar days of hire. The license holder documented that SP3 received basic first aid training on “12/27/202,” which was insufficient for licensors to fully determine the date of completion. Statute Violated: Minnesota Statutes, section 245D.09, subdivision 4. 15. Violation: For three staff persons whose records were reviewed (SP1-SP3), the license holder did not maintain personnel records as required. The license holder did not maintain documentation in SP1’s-SP3’s personnel record that included the number of hours per subject area and the name of the training or instructor for each topic area. Statute Violated: Minnesota Statutes, section 245D.095, subdivision 5. 16. Violation: For one staff person whose record was reviewed (SP3), the license holder did not provide training to the program abuse prevention plan (PAPP) as required. The license holder did not provide SP3 with an annual training to PAPP for the site of the person served that SP3 provided direct support to in 2025. SP3 last received this training on April 1, 2024. Statute Violated: Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.65, subdivision 3. 17. Violation: For two staff persons whose records were reviewed (SP1, SP3), the license holder did not conduct a background study before allowing unsupervised direct contact with persons served by the program as required. a. SP1 was hired on January 3, 2024 and had unsupervised direct contact with persons served by the program on January 6, 2024. The license holder did not receive a background study clearance for SP1 until March 25, 2024. b. SP3 was hired on April 17, 2023 and had unsupervised direct contact with persons served by the program on April 20, 2023. The license holder did not receive a background study clearance for SP3 until May 9, 2023. Statute Violated: Minnesota Statutes, section 245C.04, subdivision 1, paragraphs (g and h). License holders determined to have a background study violation are required to pay a $200 fine for each violation. Because license revocation is a more severe sanction against your license, DHS is not imposing this fine. Nature, chronicity, or severity of violations and the effect of violations on the health, safety, or rights of person served by the program. The Commissioner considered the nature, chronicity, and severity of the violations of law or rule and the effect of the violation on the health, safety or rights of persons served by the program: • Nature: There were seventeen violations in this order related to the health, safety, and rights of the persons served. In addition, you provided false and misleading information to DHS, which is an independent basis to revoke a license. The citations involved your inability to understand applicable laws and rules, the failure to document the services you were to provide, and you failed to properly train staff. • Chronicity: Your program received its HCBS license on February 10, 2021. The information below summarizes your licensing history: August 17, 2026: Revocation (this order): 17 violations · Severity: You demonstrated that you lack competent knowledge to run a program and to meet the needs of the persons served. The seventeen violations relate to the health and safety of the persons served. You did not ensure the designated manager and designated coordinator provided the required oversight which contributed to the violations. Your records were disorganized and incomplete and staff were not properly trained. You failed to train staff on the unique needs of the persons served and their vulnerabilities. You did not complete initial service planning or IAPPs, which are an individualized assessment of the person’s susceptibility to risk of abuse, neglect, and financial exploitation, within the required time. You did not complete the IAPP for P1 for over two years after P1 began receiving services and for over a year for P3. During that time there was no way to ensure staff were trained on how to minimize the risks to the person served. The IAPPs were missing required information and were inconsistent with the person’s needs. You did not complete accurate and timely assessments of each person’s vulnerabilities and abuse prevention strategies, leaving them suspectable to abuse. You did not ensure that staff completed essential orientation and annual trainings, which are crucial in providing the necessary skills and knowledge and to understand the unique needs of the vulnerable people served. Further, you allowed two staff to work unsupervised without a background study, putting the safety of the person served at risk. During the licensing review and licensing investigation, DHS determined that you knowingly provided false or misleading information to the Commissioner. Licensing reviews require license holders to provide complete transparency and honesty, without which DHS has no assurance you can be trusted with the care of vulnerable adults in the absence of constant supervision. Legal Authority: Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.07, subdivision 3(a)(1). 3. Commissioner’s evaluation of program In determining whether a licensing action is warranted, DHS evaluated the facts, conditions, and circumstances concerning your program’s operation, the well-being of persons served, the qualifications of staff persons, and the license holder’s ability to demonstrate competent knowledge of applicable statutes and rules. The Commissioner determined revocation is appropriate based on the relevant factors discussed below: Regarding the program’s operation and well-being of persons served, as a provider of intensive support services, you are required to work with the support teams of the persons served to complete critical assessments and to develop support plan addendums. As an ICS provider you were required to provide support and training in the community living service categories. You did not provide documentation showing you were providing necessary services to the people who needed these intensive support services. Without assessments and support plan addendums in place, DHS is unable to determine if you are adequately providing for the unique needs of the service recipients. Further related to the program’s operation and well-being of persons served, on November 13, 3025, DHS issued a Notice of Payment Withold to your program because the Commissioner determined there was a credible allegation of fraud for which an investigation is pending. Regarding the qualifications of personnel, your designated manager and designated coordinator did not ensure compliance with laws and rules resulting in 17 violations. In addition, you failed to meet staff training requirements. Further, you allowed two staff to work without a background study, which put the persons served at risk. Many of the violations involve your lack of competent knowledge of the applicable requirements of statutes and rules for providing Home and Community-Based Services. Further, at the licensing review you demonstrated a lack of understanding of your legal obligations as a license holder. Your inability to safekeep records and document the services are being provided put the persons served at risk. Based on the level of significant noncompliance, DHS has determined that you do not have competent knowledge of applicable statutes and rules to operate a HCBS program and is concerned about the health, safety, and rights of the people you serve. Legal Authority: Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.04, subdivision 6. Due to the serious and chronic nature of these violations and the conditions in the program, which impact the health and safety of persons served in your care, your license to provide Home and Community-Based Services is revoked. CLOSURE OF LICENSE On March 17, 2026, you notified DHS of your request to close your license to provide HCBS services. Please note that failure to reapply or closure of a license by the license holder before an investigation is complete does not preclude DHS from issuing a licensing action at the conclusion of the investigation. Legal Authority: Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.07, subd. 1, paragraph (d). YOUR RIGHT TO APPEAL You have the right to appeal the revocation. Your request must be in writing and clearly state that you are requesting a contested case hearing for this matter. Your request must be made before the deadlines provided below. If you do not meet this deadline, you lose your right to an administrative appeal. The timeline to appeal began when you received this order. If you are mailing your request, it must be sent by certified mail and postmarked within 10 calendar days from when you received this order. Please send it to: Commissioner, Department of Human Services Office of Inspector General Legal Counsel’s Office Attention: Licensing Legal Unit PO Box 64953 St. Paul, MN 55164-0953 If your request is being personally delivered, it must be received by DHS within 10 calendar days from when you received this order. Please bring it to: Commissioner, Department of Human Services Office of Inspector General Legal Counsel’s Office Attention: Licensing Legal Unit 444 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 Upon DHS’ receipt of your timely appeal, your case would be scheduled for a contested case hearing in front of an Administrative Law Judge. Following this hearing, the Commissioner of DHS will issue a final order. If you do not appeal or if the order is affirmed by the Commissioner following a hearing, DHS is prohibited from issuing you and the controlling individuals a license for five years. In addition, any additional licenses held by you or the controlling individuals shall also be revoked. Legal representation at the contested case hearing: You do not need a lawyer to appeal. However, a lawyer can help you with your appeal. The state or county will not get you a lawyer and will not pay for a lawyer. If you cannot afford a lawyer, you may be able to get free legal advice or help with your appeal. To find out if free help is available, contact: Volunteer Lawyers Network at 612-752-6677; Central Minnesota Legal Services at 612-332-8151; Southern Minnesota Legal Services at 651-222-4731; or go to www.lawhelpmn.org to find a local legal services program that may be able to help you. You can also find information on contested cases from the Court of Administrative Hearings website at https://mn.gov/oah/self-help. Click on Administrative Law Overview, then click on Administrative Law Contested Case Hearing Guide for a list of frequently asked questions. Operating the program pending the outcome of the appeal: If you file an appeal within the timeframes described above, you may continue to operate pending the outcome of your appeal. If you continue to operate, you must comply with the conditions described below. If you continue to operate, you must do so in full compliance with all licensing laws and rules. Failure to follow a law or rule that may impact the health or safety of persons served by your program could result in the immediate suspension of your license. If you continue to operate pending the outcome of your appeal, you must comply with the following conditions: 1. You must notify current persons receiving services and all payer sources of this Order of License Revocation. The notification must be approved by DHS Licensing prior to being sent to persons receiving services and all other parties. The notification must specify the reasons your license was revoked, and it must include a copy of the Order of License Revocation. You must comply with the following deadlines: · Within 20 days of the date of this Order of License Revocation, you must receive approval of the draft of your notice from your licensor. · Within 30 days of the date of this Order of License Revocation, you must notify current persons receiving services and payer sources of the Order of License Revocation. · Within 40 days of the date of this Order of License Revocation, you must submit a list of the individuals and parties that received the notice to your licensor. Submissions required as part of this term must be sent to your Licensor: 1. by secure email at: Dylan.Sobota@state.mn.us; or 2. send fax to: 651-431-7673 ATTN: Dylan Sobota 2. As of the date of this order, you may not: · admit new participants to your program; · increase the hours or days of operation of your program; or · increase the capacity of your program. Legal authority for this licensing action · This action is taken under Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.07, subdivision 3, which describes under which conditions DHS may revoke a license. · The timeline to appeal a revocation order is provided in Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.07, subdivision 3(b). · “Controlling individual” is defined under Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.02, subdivision 5a. · Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.07, subdivision 3, paragraph (c), clause (4)(iv) states that license holders shall pay a $200 for each background study violation. · License holders have a right to appeal licensing actions and request a contested case hearing, under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 14 and Minnesota Rules, parts 1400.8505 to 1400.8612. · If a license holder files a timely appeal of a revocation order, the license holder may continue to operate the program pending a final order of the appeal under Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.07, subdivision 1(b). · Under Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.04, subdivision 7, paragraph (d), clause (3), the commissioner shall not issue or reissue a license if the applicant, license holder, or controlling individual has had a license issued under this chapter revoked within the past five years. · Under Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.04, subdivision 7, paragraph (d), clause (5), when a license issued under this chapter is revoked under clause (1) or (3), the license holder and controlling individual may not hold any license under chapter 245A for five years following the revocation, and other licenses held by the applicant, license holder, or controlling individual shall also be revoked. · Under Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.07, subdivision 1, paragraph (b), the commissioner may include terms the license holder must follow pending a final order on appeal. · Under Minnesota Statutes, section 13.46, subdivision 3(c), the commissioner may disclose the existence of an investigation of possible overpayments of public funds to a service provider or recipient or the reduction or withholding of payments if the commissioner determines that it will not compromise the investigation. · Under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.045, subdivision 4(a), when the commissioner takes an administrative action against a provider, including a suspension or revocation of a license, the commissioner must endeavor to contact the lead agency as soon as practicable and no later than 30 days prior to the administrative action becoming effective to ensure continuity of care. Questions If you have any further questions regarding this matter, you may contact Leota Bemis, Supervisor, at 651-431-5637. Sincerely,
Brittany Fogarty, Interim Unit Manager Licensing Division Office of Inspector General
|
