Waseca County
Minnesota Child and Family Service Review
Program Improvement Plan
I. General Information
County Agency: Waseca | Address: 299 Johnson Ave Ste #150, Waseca, MN 56093 Telephone Number: 507-835-0560 |
Primary Person Responsible for PIP: Wendy K. Morton | E-mail Address: wendy.morton@co.waseca.mn.us Telephone Number: 507-835-0585 |
DHS Quality Assurance Contact: Lori Munsterman | E-mail Address: lori.munsterman@state.mn.us Telephone Number: 320-255-2452 |
To be completed by DHS: | |
Date Draft PIP Submitted by County: 6/30/10 | Date Accepted: 8/4/10 |
Due Dates for Quarterly Reports: Quarter 1: October 15, 2010 (for July-Sept) Quarter 2: January 15, 2011 (for Oct – Dec) Quarter 3: April 15, 2011 (for Jan – March) Quarter 4: July 15, 2011 (for April – June) | Date PIP Progress Reviews Received/Occurred: |
PIP Completion Date: | |
II. MnCFSR PIP Recommendations (as indicated in the MnCFSR report)
PIP RECOMMENDATIONS |
Safety Address barriers to timely face-to-face contacts with children in maltreatment assessments and investigations. Ensure that face-to-face contacts occur within statutory timelines (MnCFSR Item 1). Ensure new reports on already open child protection cases are appropriately documented and formally screened. If reports meet criteria, conduct assessments or investigations, as required (MnCFSR Item 4). Permanency Evaluate the circumstances of placements lasting less than eight days, and how those placements impact foster care re-entry. Ensure that placements are made only for safety reasons, or for children to access specialized treatment. (MnCFSR Items 3 and 5, and Federal Performance Measure C1.4). Address factors contributing to delay in timely achievement of permanency, particularly for older youth and children in care for extended periods of time (Federal Performance Measures C2.1, C2.2, C2.3, C2.4, C2.5, C3.1 and C3.3). Well-being Conduct caseworker visits with children at a frequency that meets their needs, ensuring that caseworker visits with children in foster care occur each and every month, and that the majority of visits occur in the child’s residence (MnCFSR Items 4 and 19). |
SAFETY | ||||
Goal: The agency will have face-to-face contact with alleged child victims within timelines in 90 percent of child protection assessments and investigations. | Applicable Items and/or Systemic Factors: Item 1: Timeliness of Initiating Investigations/Assessments | |||
Baseline (Performance at the time of the review): Item 1: 75% of cases rated as a Strength DHS Timeliness Report, Jan – June 2009: 56.7% of reports alleging non-substantial child endangerment responded to within timelines; No reports alleging substantial child endangerment during that time period. | Demonstration of Goal Completion: Based on DHS Timeliness Report, 90% of reports (alleging either substantial child endangerment or non-substantial child endangerment) will be responded to within required timelines. | |||
Action Steps (include persons responsible) | Qtr Due | Date Completed | Quarterly Update (Identify reporting quarter, e.g. Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4) | |
On a quarterly basis, the supervisor will run the SSIS General Report “Time to Initial Contact with Victim/Other” | 1-4 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Supervisor will review the “Time to Initial Contact with Victim/Other” report with staff on a quarterly basis; identifying cases in which contact was not made within statutory requirements and reasons for delays. | 1-4 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
The agency will develop and implement strategies for addressing identified barriers to timely contact in assessments and investigations. | 1-4 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Measurement/Monitoring Plan: Review of relevant reports (SSIS General Reports and DHS Timeliness Report), and discussion with workers | ||||
Role of the Supervisor: Monitor the reports, assist and support workers as needed. | ||||
SAFETY | ||||
Goal: The agency will ensure that all new maltreatment reports received on open child protection cases are appropriately documented and formally screened. If reports meet criteria, the agency will conduct a child protection assessment or investigation. | Applicable Items and/or Systemic Factors: Item 4: Risk Assessment & Safety Management | |||
Baseline (Performance at the time of the review): Item 4: 37.5% of cases rated as a Strength | Demonstration of Goal Completion: All maltreatment reports on open cases will be screened and appropriate follow up completed. | |||
Action Steps (include persons responsible) | Qtr Due | Date Completed | Quarterly Update (Identify reporting quarter, e.g. Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4) | |
Agency supervisor will review (and revise if necessary) agency expectations for the handling of new reports on already open cases. | 1 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Agency supervisor will clarify agency expectations regarding the handling of new reports on already open cases with social workers (e.g. how reports are documented, screened, and responded to whether screened in or out) | 1 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Measurement/Monitoring Plan: Supervisory review of case files and case consultation with workers | ||||
Role of the Supervisor: Supervise the completion of case reviews on a regular basis; support & /or provide training in areas of assessing strengths, needs, risk and safety of families. | ||||
PERMANENCY | ||||
Goal: Ensure children are placed in foster care only when necessary for child safety or to access specialized treatment and reduce foster care re-entry. | Applicable Items and/or Systemic Factors: Item 3: Services to prevent removal or re-entry into foster care Item 5: Foster care re-entry Federal Performance Measure C1.4: Foster care re-entry | |||
Baseline (Performance at the time of the review): Item 3: 100% of cases rated as a Strength Item 5: 100% of cases rated as a Strength Measure C1.4: 42.1% (8/19); (National Standard: 9.9% i) 2008: 40.9% of children discharged from care were in care for less than 8 days | Demonstration of Goal Completion: Evaluate, document and address the most common reasons for placements lasting less than 8 days and foster care re-entry. | |||
Action Steps (include persons responsible) | Qtr Due | Date Completed | Quarterly Update (Identify reporting quarter, e.g. Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4) | |
The agency will gather placement data for 2010 from SSIS, identifying children who: were in care for less than 8 days, and children who re-entered foster care (Charting & Analysis Report Measure C1.4) | 4 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Supervisor and workers will evaluate the reasons for entry on placements lasting less than 8 days to determine: whether placement was necessary to ensure child safety whether children who were in placement for less than 8 day placements also experienced foster care re-entry | 4 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Supervisors and workers will evaluate the reasons for foster care re-entry to determine if: Placement was necessary to ensure child safety or to access specialized treatment Adequate post-reunification and placement prevention services were provided prior to the re-entry | 4 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Develop strategies/protocols to address circumstances that led to unnecessary placements or re-entries identified in action steps #2 and #3. | 4 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Measurement/Monitoring Plan: SSIS General Placement Reports; Charting and Analysis report for Federal Data Measure C1.4 (re-entry) | ||||
Role of the Supervisor: monitor reports, support use of proactive services vs reactive | ||||
PERMANENCY | ||||
Goal: Promote timely permanency for all children in out-of-home cases, specifically focusing on older youth and children in care for extended periods of time. | Applicable Items and/or Systemic Factors: Federal Performance Measures: C2.1: Adoption within 24 months of entry into foster care C2.2: Median length of stay prior to adoption C2.3: Adoption for children in care 17+ months C2.4: Achieving legal freedom for adoption for children in care 17+ months C2.5: Adoption within 12 months of becoming legally free C3.1: Permanency for children in care 24+months prior to 18th birthday C3.3: Children who turned 18 while in foster care and were in care for 3 years or longer | |||
Baseline (Performance at the time of the review): Federal Performance Measures(2008 Performance): C2.1: 0% (0/1); (National Standard: 36.6% h) C2.2: 32.2 months (National Standard: 27.3 i) C2.3: 12.5% (1/8); (National Standard: 22.7% h) C2.4: 0% (0/5); (National Standard: 10.9% h) C2.5: 0% (0/2); (National Standard: 53.7% h) C3.1: 25% (2/8); (National Standard: 29.1% h) C3.3: 50% (1/2); (National Standard: 37.5% i) | Demonstration of Goal Completion: Improved performance on National Standards. Permanency goals are continually evaluated for appropriateness. | |||
Action Steps (include persons responsible) | Qtr Due | Date Completed | Quarterly Update (Identify reporting quarter, e.g. Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4) | |
Supervisor will run relevant Charting and Analysis reports (C2.1, C2.2, C2.3, C2.4, C2.5, C3.1 C3.3) on a quarterly basis. | 3 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Supervisor and staff will review reports and identify barriers to achieving timely permanency. | 3 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Develop and implement strategies to address barriers indentified in #2. | 3 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Supervisor and staff will continually monitor placements for: efforts towards permanency exploration of adoption options appropriateness of placement completion of required Administrative Reviews | 3 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Measurement/Monitoring Plan: Charting and Analysis Reports ((C2.1, C2.2, C2.3, C2.4, C2.5, C3.1 C3.3); Case reviews | ||||
Role of the Supervisor: Complete case reviews; generate data reports and facilitate discussions regarding reports | ||||
WELL-BEING | ||||
Goal: 90 percent of children in foster care will have face-to-face visits each and every month with their social worker. | Applicable Items and/or Systemic Factors: Item 4: Risk Assessment & Safety Management Item 19: Worker visits with children | |||
Baseline (Performance at the time of the review): Item 4: 37.5% of cases rated as a Strength Item 19: 37.5% of cases rated as a Strength DHS Caseworker Visits Report, 7/1/08 – 6/30/09: 9.1% of children in foster care had visits each and every month with their caseworker | Demonstration of Goal Completion: Based on DHS Caseworker Visits Report, 90% of children in foster care will have face-to-face visits with their caseworker each and every month. | |||
Action Steps (include persons responsible) | Qtr Due | Date Completed | Quarterly Update (Identify reporting quarter, e.g. Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4) | |
Agency will revise documentation requirements to ensure all CMH caseworker visits with children are documented in SSIS. | 1 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Supervisor will run the SSIS General Report “Monthly Contacts with Children in Continuous Placement” on a quarterly basis. | 2-4 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Supervisor will review the SSIS contact report with workers quarterly; identifying cases in which monthly contact was not made and barriers to monthly contact. | 2-4 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Develop and implement strategies to address barriers to monthly visits identified in #3. | 2-4 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Measurement/Monitoring Plan: Review and discussions of SSIS General Report “Monthly Contacts with Children in Continuous Placement and DHS Caseworker Visit report. | ||||
Role of the Supervisor: Monitor reports and review with staff on a quarterly basis. | ||||
SYSTEMIC FACTOR | ||||
Goal: Develop an internal process for the ongoing evaluation of child welfare practices and systems, leading to program improvements. | Applicable Items or Systemic Factors: Quality Assurance | |||
Baseline (Performance at the time of the review): | Demonstration of Goal Completion: Review of "Month Report" folders, notes from chart reviews, notes from staff meetings, notes from staff supervision meetings. | |||
Action Steps (include persons responsible) | Qtr Due | Date Completed | Quarterly Update (Identify reporting quarter, e.g. Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4) | |
Establish and maintain a process that yields valid data: | ||||
Supervisor and workers – Monthly review of SSIS reports on timeliness of contacts in assessments and investigations, caseworker visits, completion of CMH screenings, completion of Administrative Reviews, etc. | 1-4 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Supervisor and workers – reimplement use of chart reviews (QAR or other reviews) for the purpose of monitoring compliance with rules and statutes and quality of casework practices | 4 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Develop/implement a process for analyzing and learning from the data: | ||||
Supervisor & workers – focus groups within staff | 1-4 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Supervisor – Utilize Permanency Committee, Pre-Placement Team CP Team, CJI Team, and Placement Committee to review and discuss data | 1-4 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Use the data to effectively implement practice and system change: | ||||
Supervisor and staff – Involve staff in focus groups and case mapping to evaluate practice and implement needed changes for improved service delivery | 2-4 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Supervisor and staff – Include staff in chart reviews to facilitate learning and implementation of best practices | 4 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Other: | ||||
Supervisor will continue to participate in the “Improving Supervision” initiative and implement strategies identified through that process to facilitate practice improvements | 4 | Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: | ||
Measurement/Monitoring Plan: SSIS reports, staff and other committee meetings and discussions | ||||
Role of the Supervisor: Utilize reports and meetings to analyze and monitor compliance and quality of casework practice | ||||
Report this page