Electronic visit verification (EVV) compliance policy
Page posted: 7/2/24 | Page reviewed: 12/30/25 | Page updated: 12/30/25 | |
Legal authority | |||
Definition | Electronic visit verification (EVV): An electronic system used to record data about the delivery of in-home or community-based services where people receive support with activities of daily living (ADLs) and/or instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). | ||
Overview | All providers who deliver services subject to EVV must comply with federal and state EVV requirements, including financial management services (FMS) providers and managed care organization (MCO) network providers. Failure to comply may result in corrective actions and payment sanctions under Minn. Stat. §256B.064. | ||
Provider responsibilities | Providers who deliver EVV services (including FMS providers) must: The following sections provide more information about these responsibilities. | ||
Enrollment | Providers must: | ||
Data submission | Providers must submit all EVV visits through HHAX, either: Each visit must include the following federally required EVV data elements: Comparison of confirmed and compliant visitsA visit may be confirmed but still noncompliant (i.e., does not meet all EVV verification requirements). A confirmed visit is a visit the provider enters into their EVV system that contains the required EVV data. Confirmed visits are used for claims review and may be billable if they meet all documentation requirements. However, confirmed does not mean compliant. A visit is only compliant when it is verified in real time using an approved EVV verification method such as: Providers must still submit confirmed visits for claims review and billing purposes, even when they are noncompliant. Manually entered visits and correctionsManually entered visits, corrected visits or visits that were not verified at the time of service are considered noncompliant, even if the visit is confirmed later. These visits are not compliant because they were not verified in real time. SignaturesSignatures are not required for EVV and do not affect EVV compliance. Some services that require EVV also require signatures. Providers can gather signatures within the EVV system or using their existing processes. | ||
Compliance thresholds and quarterly reviews | Beginning in 2026, DHS reviews and enforces EVV compliance for all providers, including FMS providers and MCO-contracted providers. On Jan. 1, 2026: In April 2026: By July 1, 2026: In October 2026: Note: Meeting the minimum compliance threshold does not eliminate the need for continued monitoring and improvement. DHS expects providers to continue increasing compliance across all NPI/UMPI numbers to maintain compliance as thresholds increase. | ||
Enforcement | DHS monitors and enforces EVV compliance at the provider’s tax ID level by using: DHS calculates compliance based on all NPI/UMPI number(s) associated with a tax ID. A provider’s overall compliance is affected by the performance of every NPI/UMPI under that tax ID that providers required EVV services. Noncompliance at any NPI/UMPI lowers the tax ID’s overall compliance rate. Providers are responsible to meet compliance requirements for all NPI/UMPI number(s) that provide EVV services. Focusing on one NPI/UMPI number alone is not sufficient to meet DHS compliance requirements. Noncompliance and enforcement actionsProviders are noncompliant if they fail to: Under Minn. Stat. §256B.064, DHS may take the following actions for noncompliant providers: | ||
Monthly compliance reports | On the 25th of each month, HHAX sends providers a compliance report for the previous month to the email address used during HHAX enrollment. Providers must: DHS will: | ||
Corrective actions | DHS sends corrective action notices to the MN–ITS mailboxes of providers who are noncompliant. These notices may require providers to: If providers do not respond or fail to improve, DHS may escalate enforcement actions, as described in the enforcement section above. | ||
Examples of compliance calculation | Example 1: Meeting the compliance threshold at the tax ID levelProvider Agency ABC has one tax ID with four NPIs enrolled for EVV. During a DHS quarterly compliance review period, the provider’s compliance rates are: DHS uses this calculation to determine the provider’s combined tax ID compliance: When conducting a quarterly compliance review, DHS evaluates the combined compliance rate across all NPI numbers at the tax ID level. Not every NPI number meets or exceeds 50% individually, but the overall tax ID compliance rate meets the required threshold. As a result: Example 2: Improving one NPI number but ignoring others after corrective action noticeProvider Agency XYZ has one tax ID with four NPI numbers enrolled for EVV. DHS gave them a corrective action to improve three of their NPI numbers during the last quarterly review. During the next DHS quarterly compliance review period, the provider’s compliance rates are: DHS uses this calculation to determine the provider’s combined tax ID compliance: Even though one NPI number showed improvement, the overall tax ID compliance rate remains below the required threshold because other NPI numbers continue to perform poorly. As a result of the quarterly review: | ||
Caregiver responsibilities | Caregivers delivering EVV services must: Live-in caregiversLive-in caregivers are not required to clock in and out of the EVV system in real time. Instead, they must enter required EVV data manually each day for every shift worked. DHS considers manual daily entries for live-in caregivers compliant when the caregiver enters all required EVV data elements accurately and on the same calendar day they provided services. These manual entries must include the same required elements listed in the data submission section above. Providers must: Effect on compliance reportingManual entries for verified live-in caregivers do not reduce the provider’s overall EVV compliance percentage. However, manual entries that are not properly identified as live-in caregivers count toward the DHS noncompliance calculation. | ||
MCO responsibilities | MCOs must: | ||
How to improve compliance | The following actions have the biggest impact on a provider’s compliance rate: | ||
Additional resources | DHS – EVV | ||
Report this page